Which of the following is considered a form of compromised consent?

Compromised consent occurs when an individual's ability to give consent is impaired or undermined. In the context of the choices provided, incapacitation and coercion clearly reflect situations where a person cannot freely give an agreement to participate in an activity due to external pressures or their inability to make informed decisions.

Incapacitation may arise from factors like substance use, mental health issues, or involuntary circumstances that prevent one from fully understanding the implications of their consent. Coercion involves any situation where pressure or threats are used to obtain agreement, ultimately influencing a person's ability to consent freely and voluntarily.

In contrast, mutual agreement represents a scenario where both parties can engage with full understanding and willingness, informed consent highlights the necessity of appropriate awareness and understanding when agreeing to participate, and voluntary engagement emphasizes the absence of pressure or influence. All three of these reflect instances of proper consent, thus contrasting sharply with the compromised nature of consent due to incapacitation and coercion.