Which statement about harassment is true?

The statement that athletes who are "different" are more vulnerable to harassment is true because it highlights a significant issue within sports and broader social contexts. Individuals who stand out due to various characteristics—such as their ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation, or even differing abilities—often become targets for harassment. This vulnerability stems from societal biases and prejudices that can manifest in team dynamics, leading to a higher risk of bullying or discriminatory behavior towards those perceived as "different." Understanding this aspect of harassment is crucial for creating a safe and inclusive environment where all athletes can participate without fear of being targeted due to their identity.

In contrast, the other statements either mischaracterize the nature of harassment or assert debunked ideas. Harassment can indeed contain elements of bias, as it often arises from prejudiced views about a person’s identity. Additionally, hazing is closely linked with harassment, as it can involve coercion and unwanted behavior that targets individuals based on their status or differences. Lastly, harassment is not limited to the realm of competition; it can occur in various contexts and is more about power dynamics and personal interactions than competition itself.